However, it remains accessible to how reader identifies that it performs, the substance out of condition
Medical studies, try tips, efficiency and you can interpretations is designed regarding attention, and creativeness and you will keyword and you will concept coding. Ideal reporting of show is also vital. Especially in theoretical physics, linguistic expertise and you will carefulness whenever you are creating get a very pressing you would like within the the new sufferers during the horizons out-of established degree. You can find folks from other industries that happy to get me wrong and you may ignite way too many discourses/conclusions; it create guides out of a number of bytes of data such as «yes/no/maybe»; for that reason, nonscience otherwise occult misinformation is offered, examples of hence are plentiful on the sphere from special relativity idea and you can quantum physics. Thus, research must not use the phrases you to definitely supported this new Paleolithic brain. Category: Standard Research and you may Values
Trappist-step 1 Superstar Program
The James Webb Room Telescope (JWST) will soon transcend just what Hubble could have been in a position to discuss. One of the very first purpose would be the latest TRAPPIST-step one star system from inside the Aquarius. So it essay examines as to why one puny reddish dwarf is really so fascinating, and exactly why the fresh new look for alien lives variations age. Category: Standard Science and you will Thinking
Physical dimensions like «mass», «length», «charge», represented by the symbols $[M], [L], [Q]$, are <\it>, but used as <\it>to perform dimensional analysis in particular, and to write the equations of physics in general, by the physicist. The law of excluded middle falls short of explaining the contradictory meanings of the same symbols. The statements like «$m\to 0$», «$r\to 0$», «$q\to 0$», used by the physicist, are inconsistent on dimensional grounds because «$ m$», «$r$», «$q$» represent <\it>with physical dimensions of $[M], [L], [Q]$ respectively and «$0$» represents just a number — devoid of physical dimension. Consequently, the involvement of the statement «$\lim_$, where $q$ is the test charge» in the definition of electric field, leads to either circular reasoning or a contradiction regarding the experimental verification of the smallest charge in the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. Considering such issues as problematic, by Spiritual Sites dating site choice, I make an inquiry regarding the basic language in terms of which physics is written, with an aim of exploring how truthfully the verbal statements can be converted to the corresponding physico-mathematical expressions, where «physico-mathematical» signifies the involvement of physical dimensions. Such investigation necessitates an explanation by demonstration of «self inquiry», «middle way», «dependent origination», «emptiness/relational existence», which are certain terms that signify the basic tenets of Buddhism. In light of such demonstration I explain my view of «definition»; the relations among quantity, physical dimension and number; meaninglessness of «zero quantity» and the associated logico-linguistic fallacy; difference between unit and unity. Considering the importance of the notion of electric field in physics, I present a critical analysis of the definitions of electric field due to Maxwell and Jackson, along with the physico-mathematical conversions of the verbal statements. The analysis of Jackson’s definition points towards an expression of the electric field as an infinite series due to the associated «limiting process» of the test charge. However, it brings out the necessity of a postulate regarding the existence of charges, which nevertheless follows from the definition of quantity. Consequently, I explain the notion of <\it>that act as the middle way to resolve the contradiction regarding the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. In passing, I provide a logico-linguistic analysis, in physico-mathematical terms, of two verbal statements of Maxwell in relation to his definition of electric field, which suggests Maxwell’s conception of dependent origination of distance and charge (i.e. $[L]\equiv[Q]$) and that of emptiness in the context of relative vacuum (in contrast to modern absolute vacuum). This work is an appeal for the dissociation of the categorical disciplines of logic and physics and on the large, a fruitful merger of Eastern philosophy and Western science. Category: General Science and Philosophy